A time of reckoning . . .

On June 26th, a representative and partner of the accounting firm, Mauldin & Jenkins, declared the Association books to be “clean and in good order”. (1a)

This audit opinion was made possible only after the required write-off of $1,544,897 in capital assets (associated with the Clubhouse and Choctaw renovations) resulting in a similar reduction to 2024 income and property owner equity. For example, management’s restated financial results (2) now reflect a net loss from operations of  ($761,185) versus the $730k positive result originally reported.

Continue reading “A time of reckoning . . .”

Back to the numbers again . . .

With a lengthy May 29th board meeting that was informative at times and misleading at others along with the recently posted April financial package, there is much to talk about. Perhaps it’s time to put the trademark discussions on the back burner for a moment and refocus attention to other financial matters. Continue reading “Back to the numbers again . . .”

More about that Big Canoe trademark . . .

Now isn’t it remarkable that our Board of Directors actually considered changing the name of our beloved community when the outright purchase of the name and trademark was available for less than the cost of the recently purchased clubhouse dining furniture? (1) It is quite frankly unfathomable that our elected leadership instead chose to subject the property owners and our community to so much distress and reputational damage (2) by arrogantly announcing their intentions to “unbrand” at the February 27th board meeting. Continue reading “More about that Big Canoe trademark . . .”

About that Big Canoe trademark . . .

By now, most property owners have either read the POA e-blast (1) or listened to the January 30th board meeting (2) regarding the issues surrounding the Big Canoe trademark. The board is embarking on two parallel paths to either purchase the trademarks “at an acceptable cost” or proceed with plans to change the name of our fifty two year old community. No further comment is needed by this writer at this time. Instead, this post will serve only to provide additional important details about those negotiations. Continue reading “About that Big Canoe trademark . . .”